Tags: Example Of Apa EssayRaskolnikov EssayAn Essay On Terrorism Happens BecauseWhat Is A Leader EssayNo Homework ArgumentResearch Paper On Capital PunishmentEssay On The Scarlet Letter HypocrisyEssays On Sophocles AntigoneDavid Nirenberg Of Violence Thesis
This enlightened vision was a tremendous advance over earlier, more restricted views about who matters morally; yet it still excludes a far larger number of beings who can both enjoy life and suffer: nonhuman animals.They, or at least those capable of feeling pain, which at a minimum includes all vertebrates, are also entitled to concern.This is from the philosophical argument for animal rights by Angus Taylor: "If we ascribe certain moral rights to humans on the basis of particular qualities such as the ability to suffer or the capacity for self-awareness, then we cannot deny those rights to non-humans who possess the same qualities.""If we ascribe certain moral rights to humans on the basis of particular qualities such as the ability to suffer or the capacity for self-awareness, then we cannot deny those rights to non-humans who possess the same qualities." The whole idea is not as far-fetched as one might think.
In India, the Kerala high court decreed that circus animals were entitled to a dignified existence within the meaning of the Indian constitution.
In 2014, Quebec amended its Civil Code to say that animals were more than property, that they were sentient beings.
Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments.
Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
On the other, lawyers for the university say to grant the writ would endow the animals with "personhood", and create a "slippery slope." Until a few years ago, I never paid much attention to how the animals I ate found their way to my table, let alone to the idea that they deserved some kind of rights. She is the extraordinary woman who overcame autism to become the world's leading expert of the ethical treatment of domestic animals. On the face of it, the New York lawsuit seems preposterous.
How could an animal's so-called rights be placed on the same plane as those of a human being?Well, the answer can be found in an important just-released book called , published by Irwin Law.In a series of 12 absorbing essays, the authors make a strong case for consideration of rights for animals.Throughout recent history, although mostly in contemporary American society, a general topic for moral discussion is the ethical treatment of animals.Much debate has resulted from this topic, with the major question being, "should animal life be given the same respect as human life." In this essay, I shall argue to defend the view that all life is worthy of respect, life including those species extending beyond that of Homo sapiens.Taken together, they suggest that bestowing certain rights on animals enhances us as a country.The editors remind us of the famous quote by Gandhi: "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses.The Koran, too, encourages Muslims to treat animals with kindness; the Prophet Muhammad is said to have cut off the sleeve of his shirt rather than disturb a cat who was sleeping on it.The modern animal welfare movement started in the West.MIYUN PARK is Executive Director of Global Animal Partnership. De Camp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne.He is the author of Animal Liberation, among other books.