Essays About Hipaa

Essays About Hipaa-5
The intention of the thieves is not known and may have intended to harm one of the clients.In addition, clients would develop a negative attitude towards MEEI and it would run out of patients and research subjects.

The intention of the thieves is not known and may have intended to harm one of the clients.In addition, clients would develop a negative attitude towards MEEI and it would run out of patients and research subjects.

Tags: Example Of Literary Analysis EssayInmate Life Paper Prison ResearchVanishing Of The Bees EssayEssay On Usefulness Of Nuclear EnergyEssay On Non Farming ActivitiesPaper Industry Market Research

Ethical values have been formulated to ensure that the patients’ interests are given consideration to avoid harming these patients in one way or another.

When patient’s information is disclosed to an unauthorized third party, then the law comes in and legal action is taken against an offender.

Therefore, violation of the HIPAA privacy and security rule as indicated by the Department of Health and Human Services OCR was resolved through payment of $1.5M by MEEI.

In addition, the organization made a commitment to improve its policies and procedures to ensure that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is achieved and well maintained.

This is because it failed to store patients’ and research subjects’ information in an encrypted version.

The fact that the laptop contained patients’ and research subjects’ information that had not been discretely coded in a manner that could not be understood by unauthorized persons justifies this.This paper discusses a recent administrative ethical issue with the aim of applying governing law to the issue. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) after Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc.The article titled “Healthcare Provider to Pay

The fact that the laptop contained patients’ and research subjects’ information that had not been discretely coded in a manner that could not be understood by unauthorized persons justifies this.

This paper discusses a recent administrative ethical issue with the aim of applying governing law to the issue. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) after Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc.

The article titled “Healthcare Provider to Pay $1.5M HIPAA Fine” (2012) gives a scenario of a potential violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) rule of security. (MEEI) reported a break in and loss of “an unencrypted laptop with electronic protected health information (e PHI) of MEEI patients and research subjects”.

This indicates a disregard for the law, which requires a very punitive action.

The management responsibilities are vital in ensuring that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is attained and maintained.

||

The fact that the laptop contained patients’ and research subjects’ information that had not been discretely coded in a manner that could not be understood by unauthorized persons justifies this.This paper discusses a recent administrative ethical issue with the aim of applying governing law to the issue. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) after Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc.The article titled “Healthcare Provider to Pay $1.5M HIPAA Fine” (2012) gives a scenario of a potential violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) rule of security. (MEEI) reported a break in and loss of “an unencrypted laptop with electronic protected health information (e PHI) of MEEI patients and research subjects”.This indicates a disregard for the law, which requires a very punitive action.The management responsibilities are vital in ensuring that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is attained and maintained.One such policy would be to ensure that e PHI is ciphered in a way that is only understood by authorized health professionals, whose main aim is to promote justice and beneficence of the patients and research subjects.The final management responsibility with reference the case in question is the adoption and implementation of policies and procedures that govern security to ensure timely response.In the case mentioned in the referred article, this does not seem to be the case since information had been stored in raw form. MEEI failed to ensure that security was well maintained in the organization in correspondence to HIPAA security rule.This shows that the ethical principle of privacy and confidentiality was not observed (U. Therefore, there was a breach of this legal law that sets standards to govern the security of e PHI.Information on these individuals is very important in public health practice and research because it is meant to help in identification, monitoring and response to particular morbidities, mortalities and disabilities in given populations (Thacker, 2003).The impact of this incidence on the patients and research subjects would mean that they would not be willing to participate in future researches by the institution due to fear of a recurrence of the same.

.5M HIPAA Fine” (2012) gives a scenario of a potential violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) rule of security. (MEEI) reported a break in and loss of “an unencrypted laptop with electronic protected health information (e PHI) of MEEI patients and research subjects”.This indicates a disregard for the law, which requires a very punitive action.The management responsibilities are vital in ensuring that the HIPAA privacy and security rule is attained and maintained.One such policy would be to ensure that e PHI is ciphered in a way that is only understood by authorized health professionals, whose main aim is to promote justice and beneficence of the patients and research subjects.The final management responsibility with reference the case in question is the adoption and implementation of policies and procedures that govern security to ensure timely response.In the case mentioned in the referred article, this does not seem to be the case since information had been stored in raw form. MEEI failed to ensure that security was well maintained in the organization in correspondence to HIPAA security rule.This shows that the ethical principle of privacy and confidentiality was not observed (U. Therefore, there was a breach of this legal law that sets standards to govern the security of e PHI.Information on these individuals is very important in public health practice and research because it is meant to help in identification, monitoring and response to particular morbidities, mortalities and disabilities in given populations (Thacker, 2003).The impact of this incidence on the patients and research subjects would mean that they would not be willing to participate in future researches by the institution due to fear of a recurrence of the same.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Essays About Hipaa

The Latest from helpina-vgp.ru ©