Tags: Short Opinion Essay About SmokingStages Of Problem SolvingRead Satire EssaysEssays On Perseverance And DeterminationFive Paragraph Persuasive Essay On School UniformsSample Of Research Paper In EnglishWant Go College EssayEssay On Pharmacogenomics
We’ve all heard the abominations which pass for popular political discourse throughout America today.
The best way to determine the intent of the founders when drafting the US Constitution is to read them for yourself.
Then you can be the judge of whether or not the federal government is abusing the power afforded it by the US Constitution.
Robert Higgs’ essay regarding individual rights and the nature of government is a reality-based summary which should be widely read. Bradford’s contribution, “Not So Democratic,” is an outstanding essay regarding the profoundly “undemocratic” beliefs of the framers of the Constitution and the numerous antimajoritarian mechanisms within the document.
Higgs destroys the false dichotomy between “human rights” and “property rights,” but not before reminding us that “[e]very government, ultimately if not immediately, relies on physical violence to enforce its rule.” Professor Dwight Lee’s piece on “The Political Economy of the U. Constitution” offers a particularly good review of the U. Supreme Court’s economic jurisprudence through 1986. Lee’s likening the government to the role of a referee in a football game is just the sort of illustration appropriate for those who seldom or never have thought through the implications of Constitution-related discussions they’ve heard before. The Constitution is no mere blueprint for populist, majoritarian government; the super-majority votes required for amending the Constitution obviously are structured and required to prevent tinkering by bare majorities.
Three facts for consideration, a portion of our population increase is from immigrants and others without an innate sense of what it means to be an American, our schools lack an interest in teaching the constitution and some of our representatives in high office are violating the document they have sworn to uphold.
Perhaps a modern day Hamilton or Madison will read the summaries consider these issues and conclude a repeat of the original task is necessary and decide to author The Tea Party Papers.
As an active Tea Party member, you should also familiarize yourself with the US Constitution which our members of Congress have sworn to uphold.
Read it and decide for yourself if our government officials have lived up to their sworn oath.
FEE’s most recent collection of essays, essays spans 30 years, including contributions from historian Clarence Carson; the late M. Bradford, the noted “Southern agrarian” conservative; philosopher John Hospers; historian Robert Higgs; and economist Dwight Lee, among others.
The book is marketed as a primer, but be assured that the person who absorbs this book’s lessons will gain a sober grasp of the intellectual ground from which the Constitution grew, its historical context, what the Founders intended it to accomplish, the permissible reach of government powers, and how profoundly “undemocratic” our government was structured to be—and why that’s so.