This section elaborates the background of the study (Historical, Theoretical, and Conceptual perspectives), Problem statement, Purpose, Specific objectives, Research questions, Hypothesis, Scope of study and Significance of the study were explored.Tags: Dessay DaughterForeign Direct Investment Research PaperMacbeth Essays On BetrayalCoursework Resources For EnglishEssay On N Economy 2010Write Thesis Statement Art History PaperEnglish Gcse Coursework 2009Essay About Transplants Organs
At the end it was concluded that the autocratic leadership is useful in the short term and democratic leadership style is useful in all time horizon.
And participation leadership style is most useful in long term and effect on employees is positive. Leadership; Participative; Autocratic; Democratic; Employee performance Background This study is about the effect of leadership styles on employee performance which majorly focused on employees.
This problem happen due to lack of strategic interventions of specific leadership styles to the particular situations was predicted as the problem at hand.
This problem was continuously affecting employee performance.
On the other hand, sources in secondary research will include previous research reports, newspaper, magazine and journal content.
Existing findings on journals and existing knowledge on books will be used as secondary research.
The above should lead to efficiency, specialization, effective feedback and good organizational relations.
Both terms (leadership and employee performance) cohesion should be proved through styles and approaches in attempt to cause efficiency which variable in this study was leadership and indeed Carter  defined leadership as the ability to employ managerial competencies to organized performance processes by inspiring, igniting and motivating teams to meet set organizational goals.
In past, the previous study investigated performance phenomena and how it was affected by various variables such as: Leadership, and with its different leadership styles such as participative, autocratic, and democratic.
It was noted that, in most studies, the concept of participative approach was highly lacking yet in the data collected, it was noted that this approach was critical to the sustainability of leadership processes especially in large work environments.